I would just very quickly agree that it's a no-lose policy to work on the measurement. To my knowledge—and I'm not an expert in this field—the measurement and the science of soil carbon capture and release is not there yet. However, it provides a foundation, not only for the kinds of things we're talking about here but for the proper functioning of offset markets that might rely on agricultural soil carbon retention in the future. That's all good.
Let me try one more time to convince you why this isn't a threat, though, if we're talking about the CBAM or carbon adjustment. The CBAM functions by asking individual producers for their data. It's not a national average figure. It works in the context of steel. We have about six big steel mills in Canada. How many agriculture producers do we have in Canada? Would you imagine a system that asks each of them to measure at the farm level, at the operation level, their carbon intake and their carbon emissions and then report on that?
Would it make any economic sense for any individual operator to participate in a regime like that, or would we just export somewhere else?