Evidence of meeting #113 for Agriculture and Agri-Food in the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was production.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

Members speaking

Before the committee

Serge Buy  Chief Executive Officer, Agri-Food Innovation Council
Jasmine Sauvé  Executive Director, Association des producteurs de fraises et de framboises du Québec
Keith Currie  President, Canadian Federation of Agriculture
Greg Northey  Vice-President, Corporate Affairs, Pulse Canada
Stéphanie Forcier  Public Relations Manager, Association des producteurs de fraises et de framboises du Québec
Scott Ross  Executive Director, Canadian Federation of Agriculture
Kyle Larkin  Executive Director, Grain Growers of Canada
Troy Sherman  Senior Director, Government and Industry Relations, Canola Council of Canada
Benoit Legault  General Manager, Producteurs de grains du Québec
Pascal Forest  President, Producteurs de légumes de transformation du Québec

10:30 a.m.

Executive Director, Grain Growers of Canada

Kyle Larkin

It's a great question. Our worry is that if Canada moves ahead unilaterally with a CBAM or multilaterally with the European Union, it wouldn't help on fertilizer either.

Let me be clear: Canada has a large manufacturing sector for fertilizers, but only certain fertilizers. We're a proud manufacturer of potash, for example, in the prairies, but all of the phosphate farmers require in Canada is imported, and it's imported from places like the United States, Morocco and Algeria. While we may create a CBAM with the U.S.—we're obviously collaborating with our American counterparts on a daily basis—I'm very doubtful that we would include Morocco and Algeria in any of those conversations.

It's a big concern. We import $3 billion worth of fertilizers that go to grain farmers. That's essential for crop production. Fertilizers, pesticides, seeds and other inputs are essential, and the prices of those inputs are going up on a daily basis. Anything the government can do to alleviate the increase in input costs is something we're in support of. We're certainly not in support of mechanisms or policies that would increase taxation or increase the cost to grain farmers.

The Acting Chair NDP Richard Cannings

Okay.

I have one last question for Monsieur Forest.

You mentioned benefits to American producers through the IRA. Could you comment on what you think Canada should be doing to offset those or, again, bring in reciprocity? How should we support our agriculture sector to offset those benefits that the American farmers are enjoying?

10:30 a.m.

President, Producteurs de légumes de transformation du Québec

Pascal Forest

Thank you for the question, Mr. Chair. I will probably repeat the same answer.

I think it is important for the assistance we offer on this side of the border to be on the same scale as what the American government offers to its farmers on the other side of the border. We should have the same percentage of assistance if we want to get the same results. It’s the same thing when it comes to investing in research. It’s important for us to really know where we’re headed and see Canada’s interest in agriculture. If our goal, here in Canada, is to have local products coming from local agriculture, and to be able to export our local products, it’s important for us to have the same rules and have good conversations so we can move forward equally, because each sector will export part of its products. I think the principle is possible, especially since we basically agree on what everyone will do to improve the situation.

The Acting Chair NDP Richard Cannings

Thank you.

With that, is everybody in favour of adjourning the meeting?

Some hon. members

Agreed.