If we look at the example of the industries impacted by the CBAM now, they've had a two-year transition period basically to adjust to the data requirements.
Similar to Keith, I would say we need a national accounting system. We need to understand our carbon intensity is better than that of any other country in the world. I would say, whether a CBAM comes or not, that is something we're already investing in, because the reality is that our supply chains want to see that kind of data. They want to understand a pulse and how it works through a supply chain, and what the fractions from a pulse are as far as carbon intensity is concerned.
We're investing in that already, but absolutely, for the government, when you look at all of grain production, that's the focus. There's a win-win there, because the reality is, whether there will be a BCA or not—who knows—that data, that understanding of what our intensities are, how to account for them, setting the global standard.... Canada should be leading, setting the global standard on that kind of thing and understanding our national inventory report better. Canada can lead in that whole space, and we can basically insulate ourselves against a BCA or other supply chain requirements.