Great. Thank you for that question.
With respect to how to measure the footprint, to me, there are two layers to that question. One part is how to measure it, which we know how to do, but also how to measure it in a cost-efficient manner is perhaps the second, trickier piece.
In terms of how to measure it, we are aware of the various components that need to go into that calculation. When we think about an entire life-cycle analysis, that should ultimately go into a comprehensive assessment of the carbon intensity of a particular crop. I would argue that we're further along in some of the larger, more dominant commodities, and less so in the smaller, more niche ones.
However, in terms of where the challenge lies, it's in the pieces that I raised earlier: It's with respect to the variability that is inherent in that.
I'll use the example of the work that was put out by the Global Institute for Food Security. It was very nicely rolled up at a provincial level. We could look at the carbon intensity on average across Saskatchewan or across countries based on the typical set of practices.
Now, does it matter if we have a producer over here who is implementing those practices and another over here who is not? That's the trickier question to consider if we're actually trying to use this as a mechanism whereby we incentivize different practices.