We're very concerned about the way the Pest Management Regulatory Agency, or PMRA, operates. We certainly adhere to the principles of scientific rigour and independence in order to protect the health of our fellow citizens, however, we believe that a rigorous but more time-efficient analysis process can be put in place.
Submission times for plant protection products are far too long to allow us not only to adapt adequately to commercial changes, but also to climate change. At present, the PMRA is unable to meet its own timeliness performance targets. We are asking for a corrective plan to improve the efficiency of the current process in handling minor use applications for crop protection products.
Thirdly, let's talk about improving risk management programs. In a context of increasing climate risks, it is necessary to adapt current parameters. Climate change is exacerbating environmental problems and creating new challenges.
More than ever, government programs need to be linked more effectively to companies' personal risk management strategies. Crop insurance and AgriStability need to be reviewed to better reflect new needs. Coordination with the provinces and flexibility to implement innovative solutions that meet producers' needs are required of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
In conclusion, make no mistake. We are not advocating across-the-board deregulation, nor are we reducing the role of government. Sound, effective regulation is the mechanism par excellence and the bulwark by which the public interest is protected. When well designed, regulation aims to manage risk appropriately. We are simply asking for better collaboration with economic players.
For example, if the PMRA were to take into account—