We're at time.
Thank you, Mr. Louis. Thank you, Mr. Fulton.
Here are two quick questions from the chair.
Do you have a per-animal opportunity cost of SRM? Is that something you can provide to this committee? Knowing how many actual additional costs there are, in terms of not having SRM aligned with the U.S., would be helpful for this committee. You don't need to answer. Maybe my Conservative friends already know.
My second question is for the Canola Growers Association. APAS was on the Hill last week as part of the CFA days. One of the things that were raised was the idea that the rail companies pass the entirety of the carbon price as part of their pricing model down to shippers. Is it your understanding that this is true? Is there any policy argument to say that, although maybe some costs should be passed down, certainly the intent of the carbon price is to actually adjust and drive innovative behaviour, and if that's not happening, the entirety of the cost should not be passed on the sector? Is there validity to that argument?