No. We've advocated fairly consistently, definitely over the last five years, to get recognition and to really address the grassland loss that happens largely from a conversion to cropland.
As I relayed in my statement, we think a big part of that is simply the incentives that crop insurance provides within that program to roll the dice and try growing canola, for example, on marginal land that you know wouldn't otherwise really be able to support it. I grow both beef cattle and canola. When there is a program in place that favours one over another, it will influence my decisions on it. Really, the hope is that we can level the playing field so that the market decides what the best use of that land is. Hopefully, the market can reflect the value of that pasture in nature.