I have had a chance to meet with the railways on this exact issue. Their claim is that after 100 years, all of a sudden, they are taking care of their own water. I find that, as a farmer and someone who's been involved with the Drainage Act many times over the years, a bit incredulous because last time I checked, water still flows downhill and has to go somewhere.
What is the effect if they are successful in avoiding paying costs into the drainage schemes? Can you explain again—I think Mr. Spoelstra began—how the costs for cleaning a drain, putting up a bridge or replacing a bridge work for all those affected?