I think you might have to ask the railway companies their opinion on whether, if their costs were lowered, they'd be able to cover those costs. My expectation is that they'd still be looking to shift a lot of these costs for drainage and private crossings to others, whether they're municipalities or the people who use them.
As I said, these are long-standing agreements. We want to make sure they're honoured. We would like to see legislative amendments to make sure they are.
I think we've covered off most of the issues, but these are exorbitant costs potentially being passed on to farmers and municipalities. The railways run every day. We want to make sure they're adequately maintaining the railways. We want to make sure that safety is upheld and agreed upon, but those costs need to be covered by the railway system itself.