Okay. I was just trying to sort out what was going to happen next.
I'm going to take my time and ask a couple of questions. We've come to the end of the regular rounds.
Many of my questions have already been asked, as you can imagine, but I just want to take a couple of minutes to get some clarification on some of the issues.
I'll turn to Mr. Lawton.
You talked about how you can't answer specific questions about the Sollio case precisely, but from what I understand, you say that Sollio would have self-reported and figured out what they'd have to charge, yet a while later they received a refund for that.
I guess I'm having a hard time realizing that Sollio figured they deserved a refund. Speaking in general now, would companies in general say, “I should get a refund”, and then put in something else, or was that something that came to the industry as a whole? Are there companies other than Sollio that are affected by this situation? I'm having a hard time squaring your testimony with what we heard from Sollio.