Thank you.
Mr. Cato, I'll start with you again. I'm sorry. I'm not trying to pick on you, but hopefully if we have time and I can stop myself from talking, we might have time to move on to something else. I just want to tackle the labour issue we've heard about.
We always hear about labour disruptions. In many cases, or in most cases I've looked at with our railways or ports, it seems that they are just as often management issues. The rail strike this summer was two lockouts basically at the same time from CN and CPKC. It was seemingly done to put maximum pressure on the government to force arbitration on the unions. The Vancouver port strike was referenced. We hear a lot about Vancouver port labour disputes. That was the first strike in over 60 years in Vancouver. Everything else has been lockouts.
Your suggestion for this seems to be that we should change the labour laws in Canada to make it easier to force arbitration on unions in these situations. I'm just wondering if you have any suggestions that would involve more collaboration with unions to make them feel heard.
You talk about safety. The unions said that CPKC wanted to gut the collective agreement of all safety critical fatigue provisions. CN wanted to implement the forced relocation of workers to fill in labour shortages across the country, often for months at a time. Have you been thinking of ways to involve the unions to make sure they feel heard? Right now, it looks like you're trying to get away from their concerns.