What I'm hearing is that the entirety of the cost paid is being passed off to shippers.
There's an argument being made here. The concept is that the cost is borne to drive innovation. If the entirety of that cost is being passed off to the supply chain, it runs contrary.... We're talking about a situation where we have just two railroads, so it does beg the question at one point of whether parliamentarians say that the entirety of the cost shouldn't be passed on; it should be a true cost borne by the railroads that does not get around the price signal, thereby reducing emissions.