Sure. I'll focus it on two things.
The first would be that we need to make sure we're doing a complete life-cycle analysis when we're promoting these approaches: looking at where in the region we're placing this and then figuring out that if we are capable of the sciences, saying, okay, if we start to remove the residues, what will be the implications in the long term? Is it a matter of saying, no, you can only remove your residues this many times in a number of years and sell it to this plant, or is it only certain types of residues that can be used for that? That's one piece.
The other piece that I think we really need to be thinking about is that there are lands, particularly here in the Prairies, that aren't great for growing crops. We have a lot of salinity, for example. There are lands that aren't great for growing annual crops that might be well suited to producing other types of feedstocks.
Monsieur Caron mentioned agroforestry, for example. Are there fast-growing woody biomass crops, for example, that we could be growning in those spaces, or other types of residues that we could be producing on these more marginal agricultural lands and using those instead?
We want to make sure that we do a full life-cycle analysis and look at what are the implications of removing these residues based on the soils we are dealing with.