So you would recommend that the committee consider what's been done in the past.
There are a lot of very interesting things in what you’re saying. One of them is that it has to be effective.
Would you recommend to the committee that this compensation system be decentralized? In other words, this system would not be included in a government‑mandated program, but rather would be tailored, on a case‑by‑case basis, with a local assessment. The starting point would be the ecological performance of the soil right now, if I can call it that. Then, after a period of time, the new performance could be measured and quantified.
I will give you my personal opinion and you can tell me if it makes sense. I would see this as a new AgriInvest program. The UPA talks about an agri‑green program. Money would be directly available to farmers in accounts. As agricultural entrepreneurs, you could use this money to implement the next environmental innovation. This way, you could continuously improve your performance, which would be continually quantified, encouraged and compensated, in order to always go further. This would all be done in a decentralized way, though.
Does it make sense?