I think what we understand is that we continue to focus on reducing our greenhouse gas emissions. We've seen reduction over the last 30 years and we've set a goal for 2030 to continue to make a 33% reduction in those emissions. A lot of that comes from our increasing productivity of our grasslands, so we can produce more beef using fewer acres but also less time. That means fewer emissions and less water usage. When we do that, when we increase productivity in our grasslands through management, through improvement, through forage seeding and those types of things, we also increase opportunities for carbon sequestration.
It's not one size fits all. There are trade-offs. We recognize that we need to continue to work on the areas in which we see challenges, which means our emissions, but we also have the opportunity to increase our carbon sequestration and to maintain those wildlife habitats and biodiversity areas.
Another thing to point out is that we use a lot of marginal areas that shouldn't be used for crop production or can't be. We're producing a high-quality protein using this land, but also making sure it's maintained in a healthy way for wildlife and other benefits like carbon sequestration, which I think is one thing we view that should be complementary to other sectors, such as crops.