I've spoken to Mr. Harper—not the Mr. Harper but I would say he's the Mr. Harper of the industry—and he was talking about costs of adapting precision agriculture on farm. It can be almost half a million to close to a million dollars. Is that something that you would see as favourable for government to continue to partner with farmers if we're asking them to adapt technologies that can lower their carbon emissions or lower their emissions, as you talked about, from fertilizers?
For example, we know that there's technology that exists where you can input fertilizer directly in the ground, which would save the emissions off the fertilizers. Is that something you see as favourable?