I think the regulations will create an incentive to grow the industry. Canola is in a good position because of its scalability. It's a major crop. It's a very mature crop, and farmers are used to working with it and so on.
The other products are oil left over from rendering cattle and used cooking oil and so on that's collected from restaurants, and those are by-products of other practices that take place. They're not able to scale up the way canola or soybeans are able to do as an industry. I think the demand signals that are being created, as with the Canadian fuel regulation, will do that.
There was some mention earlier on about the CAP program and the cluster program, especially the science cluster program. I think it's that part of the agenda that's really important—making sure there's no delay in continuing those innovative programs that are looking for agronomic solutions for growers, as well as regulatory approval and ensuring that we have quick regulatory approval and science-based regulations and policy. Those kinds of framework pieces, I think, will work in concert with the mandates that have been put in place for biofuels and other areas.
The Canola Council is also a delivery agent for the on-farm climate action fund, and we're focused on nitrogen use, the precise use of nitrogen.
Those programs are also incentivized by having regulations in place, whereby we ensure we have market access in global markets so that farmers are not set back by market-access issues that come up from time to time, and that we have regulatory approval that's swift and so on. That would complement the incentive programs that are being put in place.