Everything that happens with cereals affects feedstock. We have seen an increase in the cost of feedstock. Therefore, that's an increase in the cost of meat.
It's important to understand that the grain still in Ukraine, which they said is between 20 million and 24 million metric tonnes. The number has increased because there's less consumption locally. A significant share of that is not for human consumption. It is for feedstock. One option could be to find ways to store it and then later deploy it, so we avoid a bigger disruption in the market.
What is the concern? Assume that you move out all the grain for human consumption right now. When the gap for wheat is only three million metric tonnes and the gap for maize is eight million metric tonnes, you could also create the opposite problem for farmers. If your opinion is correct—that they will increase the yield substantially—it will affect the prices in a situation where the affordability of outputs is declining substantially because of the increase of fertilizers and other inputs.
We have to be very careful to understand what is there, how that should be moved out and how it should be handled to avoid a bigger distortion.