With regard to the AgriRecovery process, whenever we complete an initiative with the province, we do take the time to conduct a “lessons learned” to see what worked well and what didn't work well with that initiative, with the idea of looking forward to how we could better respond to those disaster events and to how we implement programming. It's a very key thing we do when we finish these initiatives.
We work with the province to identify whether or not there are any gaps within the current core BRM programs. Particularly with AgriInsurance, are there ways in which we can improve the insurance coverage to deal with some of these risks going forward? When we do that, again, we're looking to make sure that the producers have the BRM tools they need in order to manage the significant risks that are threatening the viability of their farms. Of course, if there was another flooding event like this, we would try to take those lessons learned as much as possible to be able to react more quickly.
That being said, as you guys are aware, each disaster can have its own unique disaster costs with respect to the different regions of Canada and the different types of production that are occurring in sometimes localized areas. We do have to take the time to do the proper assessment with our provincial colleagues and make sure that we have the most complete information when looking at what disaster recovery costs are there. Then, what is the appropriate program response to help producers be able to take those recovery actions and get back into business as quickly as possible?
Again, we try—