I understand your point of view.
The sunset clause was mentioned earlier. You're talking about 10 years.
I'm thinking here of innovation needs. In your case, it will be difficult to answer the question, because you can't talk about buildings. In any event, I think there are more alternatives for buildings than for grain drying. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Therefore, do you think the same amount of time is needed in both cases for the carbon exemption?