No. It was a drive to efficiency. It's an example of farmers being driven. It's a happy coincidence that it is carbon-friendly, but it is a drive to efficiency, using fewer passes to put a crop in, less fuel and fewer inputs. All of those things are very important.
Our technology, the entire agricultural system and crop development have been geared toward drought-tolerant crops. Drought-tolerant crops typically have more roots, and more roots sequester more carbon. It's an example of how the system we have here in Canada is sustainable. Farmers have gone that way because it makes sense, and it makes economic sense as well.