Thank you, sir.
It seems the decision was made, obviously, for global reasons, and there wasn't much the government could do to maintain this.
We're sitting here at the agriculture and agri-food committee. As we're here discussing this, what role do you see...? Could the government have prevented this somehow?
I'm just trying to comprehend what the discussion is about and why we're discussing this here, if they did not make a formal request, if this is due to global markets and it's a corporate decision to focus on fresh meats locally and then value-added products for the export market.
Do you see that there is something the government could have, should have or would have done differently that could have affected this decision?