You mentioned you are a voracious reader of agriculture committee reports, and I commend you on that. You would be aware of the number of recommendations we've made over several Parliaments dealing with the creation of a limited deemed trust. We've also received some government responses on that. I think some of the frustration is that we've been calling for this for quite some time. The NDP has been running this in our election platform since 2015.
When we get a government response, there's a bit of equivocation where it states things like “Canada's insolvency laws aim to strike the appropriate balance between competing interests of debtors and creditors.” It wants to make sure that everyone's being treated equitably, and that any changes have to be evidence-based.
When you hear those types of points being made in a government response to a very clear recommendation that is based on overwhelming witness testimony and submissions to this committee, what are some of the first things that come to mind about how the current process is actually quite unfair and maybe the government response has glossed that over a bit?