That's great.
Thank you, Mr. Davidson. Again, I support the concept of the intention of the bill, but I have just a few technical questions.
Do you have a copy of the bill in front of you? I appreciate, Mr. Davidson, that we will have a legal technical team in front of us, but this is just so I can be sure of your intent.
Proposed new paragraph 81.7(1)(a) seems to suggest that the supplier—and in this case, as Mr. Drouin was saying, your intention is that it be the grower, so we want to make sure that it's specifically the farmer—would have the ability to have, in their invoice, a clause that would say that, in the case of a bankruptcy, they would want to avail themselves of this protection, or that once the bankruptcy has happened they would have up to 30 days.
Is that your understanding of that provision?