Thanks.
For some of the people watching the agriculture committee.... As you said, you're a voracious reader of our reports, so I'm sure there are a lot of people who are watching the agriculture committee at this hour as well. To put it in context for agriculture in Saskatchewan, if you unload a truckload of cattle and your buyer ends up not paying you for them, you can still go back and get those cattle back. It's the same if you drop off a load of grain or a semi load of canola. I think what we have to make people aware of is that—you're right—once the lettuce is out of the field and off the truck, you have a week or so to make that sale. If you make that sale and that money doesn't come into your pocket, there's no other way to replace that. I think that's the picture I want to paint for people who might ask why we're dealing with this at this time. It's because there isn't that certainty, to go back to my earlier comments.
To add on that, that's where I would say, when we're dealing with important issues in the agriculture committee—just to make people aware who are watching—that's why we needed something like this. You said earlier that the Liberals had committed to this in 2015. Our friends in the NDP committed to this in their 2015 platform. That was eight years ago, so I think this is the time we can get this done. Your bringing it forward as a private member's bill was the best option for us, as the opposition, to push for that.
Could you give a couple of comments around that?