Pardon me. I'm wrong. It would actually be after G-2.
Mr. Barlow, do you want to move this, or at least signal your intent to move it?
Procedurally, is he allowed to move this when I turn it to him?
We have a Canadian standoff here. My understanding is that Mr. Barlow is not able to move his motion as presented now. We would have to vote down NDP-2, vote down G-2 and then entrust Mr. Barlow to his work.
Colleagues, the way it's being explained to me is that Mr. Barlow would not be able to move what he's tabled until after we vote on both NDP-2 and G-2. Mr. Barlow would then be in a position to table what he has on paper, but there's no way to pre-emptively put that on the table.
Go ahead, Mr. Drouin.