Thanks for the question, Mr. Falk.
Certainly, when we look at Manitoba, we have growers growing a number of different crops—corn, soybeans, canola and wheats. In the Red River Valley, there's a very diverse ecosystem with lots of options for growers, which is fantastic. When the soybean part of that rotation comes in, they are not required to use nitrogen fertilizer. Soybeans are part of crop rotation, and producers need to grow multiple crops to have a healthy ecosystem and to manage their risk.
Producers are certainly looking at how they can make that crop rotation as sustainable, as resilient and as risk-manageable over time as they can, and nitrogen fertilizer is part of getting yields for other crops—not for soybeans, because we don't need nitrogen applied, but for other crops.
I think your question is a good one. Farmers are certainly looking to be sustainable over the long term. Reducing nitrogen for the sake of reducing nitrogen is a challenging one even if farmers are looking to be a partner in sustainable agriculture.
It's really about producing more with less and being responsible in the long term.