I think we've had some very good conversations with the industry. I would start by saying that, and we continue to be open. We met with them just a few weeks ago. That was our last conversation. We are very committed to continuing the dialogue.
I think there are two different processes that we are speaking about. Changes to the guidance have to be within the parameters of the regulations themselves, which are quite clear that section 76 talks about adverse conditions and unforeseen circumstances. The fact that you're carrying livestock or the fact that there may be a delay at the border and some of these other things to some extent are foreseeable. There are typically certain types of delays and different points, and these should be included in contingency planning. I think we are happy and I think my provincial and territorial colleagues would be happy to talk to the industry about other types of scenarios that may be applicable in terms of clarifying the guidance.
It can go only so far. If there are other unique needs that go beyond what could be accommodated through clarifications to guidance, then that is where a section 16 exemption process may be more appropriate to respond to the unique needs of the sector. We have invited the sector to submit an application if they feel that would be a more appropriate way to address their unique needs.