I wasn't there for the previous round of negotiations, but what we were looking for was evidence of 50% difference in damage caused. Perhaps in earlier years it wasn't that high or it was higher. I'm not sure. The amount is never fixed, right? Obviously, it varies depending on what's going on in the particular event, so it's not as though.... Indeed, I was in Saskatchewan recently too, and they were asking why we weren't paying exactly the same amount as last time around. It's a different event. Obviously, the criteria are different, but the actual negotiating process would not be different.
My recollection is actually not what you're saying. In fact, I had some very specific conversations with my deputy minister colleagues, in which I said, “What is it that you need? What do you want to use? We're completely flexible on what tools you use to make this assessment.”