Yes, I think that's the only path forward.
We looked at the request from Loblaw with regard to changes, and they would have virtually neutered the code and rendered it ineffective. I think we, as an organization—by which I mean the working group from the code committee—provided some very concrete responses to them.
It was a negotiated process. Everybody around the table made compromises. To expect everybody to make further compromises at the eleventh hour for these two organizations was really unfortunate.