The issue is the imbalance. Our view is that, if there's an expectation that a retailer enters into a set of detailed contract terms, a manufacturer should have the same responsibility. It's so that we all have the same piece of paper that says these are the terms we've agreed on and this is the basis on which we should conduct business.
In the way the code reads in the specific language, from our perspective, it holds the retailer to a higher standard than the manufacturer. As a result, those manufacturers can come and change the cost or refuse to accept changes in business terms, and we are unable to do the same thing.
All we've asked for is to balance that equation out so that both sides are responsible for adhering to the same set of standards.