This is the last thing I'll ask very quickly.
You mentioned filling orders. You go out to consumers and say, “Look, we're going to have this product at this price.” You then said the food manufacturers are not providing the product that you expected.
We've heard instances both privately and, I think, even before this committee of the idea that there would be significant fines if someone only provided 98.5% of the expected product delivery. What, in your mind, is a reasonable tension there? If you ask for 50,000 units of a certain product and they come in at 98.5%, is it reasonable that a food retailer should be able to impose that?
I appreciate you want certainty. I understand that, Mr. Weston, but there are circumstances where that can add to the food costs through the entire supply chain and then get passed on to consumers, so what is reasonableness?
When I look at the provision, there's talk that there's a reasonableness clause in here such that you couldn't impose unless they really, significantly did not meet their order in a way that would be egregious under commercial terms.