We had a very comprehensive abuse of dominance investigation into Loblaw about their policies and fees as part of their dealings with suppliers. The investigation culminated in 2017 or thereabouts.
Over the course of our review, Loblaw stopped many of the practices in question. We concluded the investigation and published a pretty detailed position statement to provide more transparency on the nature of our investigation and also on where companies can cross the line in their dealings with suppliers such that they might run afoul of the Competition Act.
Since that time, there has been work in respect of the code of conduct that has really been aiming to address that. I think we've been privy to these developments and we've trying to share our knowledge of the industry from our investigation. It is a fine line between an imbalance in bargaining power between parties and crossing the line to an abuse of dominance. A lot of actions in this sector might be more defined as an imbalance in bargaining position and some of the problems emanating from that, and not necessarily a competition law problem.
We continue to work with governments at all levels to try to inform them and lend our experience with some of these issues in the sector.