Thank you for your important question.
I've reached out and spoken to many stakeholders, and we want to minimize any of those unintended consequences related to any changes in this policy or law.
Most of the groups that I spoke to, the racetrack associations and those others, understand the bill and are behind the spirit of the bill. These are groups who are primarily concerned with making sure that there's no correlation between their industries and the exporters sending horses for slaughter. These are two completely different industries.
We're going to make sure that we minimize any extra burden on those industries, and we want to hear from them, and we want to work within this committee to see if we can come up with solutions, but right now, I believe that this is a solution, a stand-alone bill that will not affect any of the livestock. It's also a bit of a reverse onus saying that, if you're proving that you're not sending this horse for slaughter, which is a vast difference, there's not much difference between one horse's getting on a plane that's travelling for a show or over to England for a coronation versus these horses that are crammed in crates and flown over to be—