That, I think, is the critical question when we talk about restructuring. The restructuring isn't changing names; it's changing expertise in some of these as we go through process verification. I'll use an example. We've been working since 2017 to get third party verifiers for the EU program, and we're still working on one and two. Right now in the U.S., through AMS, they have a group of experts who specialize in that. In 2010, it took them six months to approve their first third party verifier, and today they have 52 third party verifiers available.
You create, first of all, the mandate that they're measured against to get this done. You don't necessarily put a meat inspector there. They're incredibly important, and we need them to do their job. Health and safety is something we all believe in, but when it comes to doing these things, it may be that a country has certain certification, maybe halal certification—we're dealing with that with Indonesia right now—that's not food safety. That is a procedural thing that we need to get verified.
In the U.S., FAS, the Foreign Agricultural Service, and AMS deal with that, and they deal with it very efficiently. That's what we're talking about. You put the mandate. If it's more about marketing and quality, keep the meat inspectors, those people in charge of ensuring healthy food for Canadians, which is a different expertise. That's certainly what we believe.