Allow me to give you another example, Minister, and that's section 83.23. This involves harbouring. According to this rather wordy section, someone who harbours someone who the harbourer knows has already carried out a terrorism activity isn't guilty of an offence unless, in addition to the harbouring, the harbouring is done for the purpose of permitting the terrorist to facilitate or carry out a second terrorist activity.
To me it's very simple. Why isn't harbouring someone who the harbourer knows to have carried out a terrorist activity, in and of itself, not an offence?