I'm not clear, Minister Toews, on your comments about motive. I presume you're referring to paragraph 83.01(1)(b), talking about what I see as a threefold test. There has to be an act committed in whole or in part for political, religious, or ideological purposes, but not only for those purposes. That has to be in conjunction with intimidating the public, etc., and that also has to be in conjunction with intentionally causing certain effects.
So it's not only that you happen to believe in a particular religious ideology, which is only one of three things, but you also have to do two active things that would then bring it into the definition of terrorist activity. I'm curious as to why that somehow implied religious intolerance.