I would be surprised to find a specific act that Canadians would regard as heinous not covered in this specific legislation.
Again, you may well have hit upon the only imperfection in the entire act, to utilize your words. I'm not suggesting this act is perfect. Often a car looks perfect until you start it up. I'm wondering whether we have really started this car up yet. Have we considered every aspect? You try to do your best, but until you actually put the gas in the tank and turn that key, you want to see how well it works.
This goes back to my concern about the criticism of the security certificates. It's a very well-balanced piece of legislation, a very well-balanced device. I would be very reluctant to tamper with it until we've seen more evidence than we've seen to date.
On your considerations as a committee, go ahead and make those recommendations. I'll have some of the lawyers take a look at your suggestions. I'm not ruling any of them out.