Thank you, Mr. Chair.
My first question is for Mr. Carnevale. One of the things that we have limited witnesses on is the tier one and tier two suppliers, but they're part of the overall survival necessary for the industry to move forward, especially with new models. How vulnerable are the mould makers and tool-and-die organizations if they don't have some type of provisions change, either for Export Development Canada or through some type of program that has guarantees?
As you were mentioning, first of all, we can get rid of the PPAP system, which in my opinion is just completely counterproductive. It's inefficient. It creates more borrowing costs, whereby the banks once again come out as the winners, the ones that really benefit from this. Also, it's unproductive. It kills Canadian productivity. How important is it to structurally change those elements if there's going to be assistance?