Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you very much, everybody. I'll repeat our gratitude for your being here with us so late.
I have several questions so I'm going to try to be relatively quick, but I will preface this again by saying that we all are very concerned about the jobs throughout the industry. We are also, as parliamentarians, concerned about taxpayers' money, so we have a combined interest in being here.
First off, Mr. Carnevale, thank you very much for being here and for shedding significant light on the complexity of the challenge here. I may have questions to ask after the fact, but I just wanted to make the point that you have added here in showing that this is significantly more complex than I think most people understand and that there are tentacles to this problem that go much further. So thank you for that.
Mr. Nantais, the forecast numbers are pretty dismal, and my question is very blunt. We keep hearing questionable numbers. Several of you have talked about concerns about where the forecasts are, and whether we're sure the forecasts will actually be where they are. You've talked about the credit facility and maybe that not being enough and that we'll cross that bridge when we get to it. But with regard to the actual cash being asked of the government from the two companies, and given the significant burn rate in particular with GM--I'm not as familiar with Chrysler's numbers because as far as I know they're not appearing yet--do you think that's enough?