I see.
Even if you were to grant more concessions or whatever, in any case, you are not dependent on the company's potential actions. You may be asked to make some concessions and the company may poorly manage its assets or production, but I don't think you should be left ultimately to foot the bill. Other members opposite seem to be singing a very different tune. As they see it, things are going wrong because you are overpaid and you have too much money; basically, you're to blame if the automakers are in trouble today.
What would you say to the politicians who believe this to be true?