I'm seeing two contradictions here. Number one is that in the course of debate, the parliamentary secretaries and the ministers, including the minister of heritage, talked openly about technical amendments that were required.
There is no shortage of suggestions as to amendments, and I don't think we're going to flesh out the possibility of these amendments. If we limit the debate and limit the people heard as witnesses, it's not going to be adequate.
The second one is that not too long ago we put forward the argument that when it comes to questions to witnesses, the time was not based on party but on every individual around this table. Now it's five minutes per party. Shouldn't it be five minutes per person?