Perfect. I understand.
Your motion that we extend the meeting until the bell rings, etc., is not a dilatory motion. It would become a substantive motion, because there's a condition. I'll read from the book:
If a dilatory motion is accompanied by a condition, it becomes a substantive motion. It is then subject to the rules on the admissibility of such motions. It also becomes debatable and amendable.
We are back to the original motion as presented by Mr. Lake on the committee beginning clause-by-clause consideration of the bill.
Go ahead, Mr. Dionne Labelle.