Yes, absolutely. To me, this requirement is not in line with the reality. On the one hand, you are granting a right, but on the other hand, you are limiting that right with a provision that needlessly complicates matters for those with perceptual disabilities by making them repair digital locks. You have two opposing sides of the same coin: one side seeks to make things easier, while the other seeks to complicate them. So our amendment is entirely relevant.
That being said, given that not a single amendment intended to make life easier for these people has been accepted, I don't expect much of you, gentlemen.