Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I want to thank you all for being here and for making your presentations. As you know, the bill is very technical. It's long and complicated. Your presentations have been able to make things very clear and concise. I'll ask probably all three of you to clarify some information, starting with Mr. Gannon, the most recent presenter.
You talked about changing the definition away from the term “digital locks”, saying that we should change it more towards protection. You talked about the balance between the enabling part of the legislation and the safe harbour part of the legislation.
I just want you to clarify some points on the difference you elaborated on by saying that the enabling part may be too narrow and we need to expand it a little bit more to catch some of these intentional abusers of the system. On the other side is the safe harbours, where we may want to narrow it so that some of these bad actors can't try to abuse that.
Could you expand a bit on the relationship between those two clauses?