I think it's fair to state that by making one thing.... The Supreme Court test has two stages, and the first sets out those things that will be fair use purposes. Simply making one thing, education, a fair use purpose does not automatically deem that one thing or any of those other purposes meets the standard of fairness set out in the Supreme Court. I don't see how placing education under the first step automatically means that it's going to pass the second step; it is not.
Placing those things into the act.... I'm not a lawyer, so I can't foresee what long-term ramifications that might have. I'm hesitant to say there's no danger in doing it, because I haven't thought about it and I'm not a lawyer.