Thank you, Chair.
And thank you to the witnesses for coming today and representing your organizations.
It's interesting to see the interdependence of the groups, how they've had their basic structure of working together over the past, and have succeeded, have faced challenges, no doubt, on both sides of the witness table here today. But as we go forward, I think what we're attempting to do, as has been said, is strike the right balance between those interdependent groups—and the witnesses who were here just previous to this are in the same situation—by bringing a piece of legislation that is fair and balanced.
When it comes to education, we heard again yesterday from a professor from the University of Western Ontario that the current provisions are fair in the sense that teachers and professors, and post-secondary educators and educators right across the full educational spectrum for that matter, will have the ability to use this as they have in the past to a certain extent. Not a lot really is changing, in the sense that the new frame of reference or the new reference points will be put into this legislation for the benefit of all parties on a certain balanced scale. That's where we're debating it at this committee.
In a general way, maybe we'll start with Ms. Andrew, with your views on striking that balance. You're in support of it. You have a few amendments. Do you think educators in general are going to change the way they do things under a new Copyright Act and the way they have been doing it and have supported that interdependence in the past?