Well, wouldn't you think it would be better to come to us and say let's define the act so that we're not going after the kids, as opposed to saying let's have unlimited damages? We want to make sure that the enablers are not getting a free ride here, but if you're saying “unlimited damages”, I'm hearing that could include kids. So if you're not sure who it is you're going after, I would suggest that if you could find some clarifying language, that would really help.
I am concerned about outlawing parody and satire. I've been a member of SOCAN for 30 years, and I've seen the industry change dramatically. Most of the bands—and I still hang out with bands now, although I'm getting a lot older and the bands are getting a lot younger, I have to admit that—talk about factor: they talk about touring support, and they talk about mechanical royalties, which is an excellent point that you raise, and the loss of the mechanical royalties. But I've never heard any band say they want to get rid of parody and satire, because bands do parody and satire. I've done parody and satire. Are you saying that should be against the law?