I think there's a fairly big effort in this bill, as I said, to try to steer—for the most part—non-commercial infringement towards the capped amount. That will generally dissuade lawsuits for unreasonable amounts against non-commercial uses. There's still, as we said—because of the amendment we put before you—a concern that it could be threatened and people might still pay up.
But generally the bill is trying to get there. There are just some parts where we're concerned that at the first stage of the litigation a demand letter could be sent, and that was what our amendment was aimed at.