Right, it's tough. But you mentioned in here that you would have to contest every fair-dealing claim. I would argue that you don't have to contest every fair-dealing claim because most of them would be fair. The ones that aren't fair you would contest and presumably would win.
You also talk about how confusing it is. You talk about years of unnecessary and expensive litigation to clarify a fair-dealing exception for education. I would argue that the law is pretty clear on fair dealing. There are pretty clear categories. There's a pretty clear definition of fair dealing as defined by the Supreme Court. You're arguing otherwise. I'm confused by that. It seems pretty clear when I read it. What's unclear about it?